[U-Boot] [PATCH 18/42] Blackfin: make sure autoconf.mk is generated early enough
Ben Warren
biggerbadderben at gmail.com
Tue Feb 10 20:23:21 CET 2009
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 February 2009 12:54:31 Ben Warren wrote:
>
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>>> We use things from autoconf.mk in the top level Makefile, so it needs to
>>> exist before doing a top level make. Otherwise, the top level make env
>>> does not get the values in the autoconf.mk.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org>
>>> ---
>>> Makefile | 2 ++
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>>> index 787c5f2..db77d3b 100644
>>> --- a/Makefile
>>> +++ b/Makefile
>>> @@ -3293,6 +3293,8 @@ BFIN_BOARDS = bf533-ezkit bf533-stamp bf537-stamp
>>> bf561-ezkit
>>>
>>> $(BFIN_BOARDS:%=%_config) : unconfig
>>> @$(MKCONFIG) $(@:_config=) blackfin blackfin $(@:_config=)
>>> + @$(MAKE) -s -B $(obj)include/autoconf.mk
>>> + @$(MAKE) -s -B $(obj)include/autoconf.mk
>>>
>> Do you really mean to do this twice?
>>
>
> unfortunately, yes. since some settings in the board config are turned into
> compiler flags and those compiler flags can in turn affect the board config,
> we need to do it twice. first is to make sure the proper cpu flags are
> propagated into the toplevel build env while the second is to make sure the
> autoconf.mk fully reflects the board config.
>
> i guess i could add a one line comment above each one giving hints about why
> each is needed ...
> -mike
>
No problem. Just a sanity check. Turns out you're sane :)
regards,
Ben
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list