[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Add support for Eukrea CPUAT91 SBC

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 22:24 Wed 22 Jul     , Ben Warren wrote:
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >>>-SRCS	:= $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c)
> >>>-OBJS	:= $(addprefix $(obj),$(SOBJS) $(COBJS))
> >>>+SRCS	:= $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c) $(COBJS-y:.o=.c)
> >>>+OBJS	:= $(addprefix $(obj),$(SOBJS) $(COBJS) $(COBJS-y))
> >>> all:	$(obj).depend $(LIB)
> >>>diff --git a/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c b/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c
> >>>new file mode 100644
> >>>index 0000000..703e58c
> >>>--- /dev/null
> >>>+++ b/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ks8721.c
> >>>@@ -0,0 +1,244 @@
> >>>+/*
> >>>+ * (C) Copyright 2006
> >>>+ * Author : Eric Benard (Eukrea Electromatique)
> >>>+ * based on dm9161.c which is :
> >>>+ * (C) Copyright 2003
> >>>+ * Author : Hamid Ikdoumi (Atmel)
> >>I'm not a fan of this implementation at all
> >>
> >>but as I've not yet finish the rm9200 cleanup
> >>I'll ack this ben what do you think?
> >>ben please note that the rm9200 cleanup will introduce a phylib support
> >Ben ping
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >J.
> This patch has many coding style violations that haven't been
> addressed, so it can't go in.  I"m not a fan of the piece-meal PHY
> implementation either, but realize that a real PHY lib isn't
> imminent, unless your rm2000 implementation is useful across
> architectures.
it will be a generic implementation
as we need it also for other soc and arch for our boards.

Best Regards,
J.