[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] Move libgcc inclusion from common Makefile to platform configs files
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Sat Jun 20 19:15:47 CEST 2009
> > > >
> > > > This is where I disagree other arch as mips and other will also need to
> > > > move away from the needs to include libgcc to be really toolchain
> > > > independant
> > > >
> > > > I do think it's really important for U-Boot be able to have full
> > > > control to have a functions embedded into.
> > > >
> > > > So stop to have libgcc include by default will really reflect it
> > >
> > > so you have two arches (mips/arm) that you dont want to use libgcc. that
> > > is still vastly the minority. if we ever do get most ports not using
> > > libgcc, then pushing it to the arch configs makes sense. but we havent
> > > and we arent even close.
> >
> > which minoroty?
>
> the majority use libgcc
>
> > I just give you example but you will see arm, mips, sh, powerpc etc...
> > toolchains problem just because we use the libgcc
>
> 4 is still the minority, but this is Woflgang's call
>
> > I've patch in qualification for mips and sh so it will not be so long
> > maybe 2 or 3 weeks
>
> considering my proposed change is much simpler, and would allow for trivial
> migration as you converted things, it still makes more sense.
it's not the size of the change, it's just I do not agree with it
Best Regards,
J.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list