[U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 1/2] Add support for the Embest SBC2440-II Board

[kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk]

On 22/06/2009 20:04, Scott Wood wrote:
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> no as you add the nand in this patch
>> the nand need to be add in a seperate patch,
>> this one need to only add the s3c2440 support
>> and the nand will be handle by Scott the nand Maintainer
> 
> If a NAND patch is sandwiched in the middle of other patches that need 
> to go via an arch tree, and depends on some of those patches, I'd rather 
> ack the NAND bits to go through the arch tree rather than try to merge 
> everything separately while still maintaining dependencies.  In that 
> case, keeping the NAND bits in a separate patch is nice, but not 
> mandatory IMHO.
> 

Thanks, leaving the NAND changes in the arch-specific patch would be simpler 
for me. I have to make some changes to the SBC2440 patch anyway so I'll make 
sure I cc you when I re-send it.

> I'll look at that patch soon.
> 
> -Scott
> 



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4179 (20090622) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com