[U-Boot] U-book and GPLv3? (fwd)

[Detlev Zundel]

Hi Matthew,

thanks for the explanation.

>> Don't you mistake "security" for "authenticity"?
>
> In this context, I believe both terms are interchangeable and effectively
> mean the same thing.

This is generally not true.  These concepts have well defined meanings.
I can have a secure communicatins channel with someone I did not
authenticate.  Also I can have a non-secure communications channel with
someone who authenticated himself by some means to me.

> It is secure because only authenticated code is allowed to be
> executed, thus another step to avoid piracy, hacking of conditional
> access systems etc.

Running only authenticated code does *not* ensure security, no matter
how much this is wished for.

But no matter, I now understand that "security" seems to mean "data can
only be handled in the way intended by the owners of the data" which is
a different concept to me.

Cheers
  Detlev

-- 
FORTRAN's tragic fate has been its wide acceptance, mentally chaining thousands
and thousands of programmers to our past mistakes. I pray daily that more of my
fellow-programmers  may find the means of  freeing themselves from the curse of
compatibility.                          -- Edsger W. Dijkstra
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich,  Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: dzu at denx.de