[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Changes for fixing the timer to 1 msec and
Dirk Behme
dirk.behme at googlemail.com
Tue Mar 10 18:57:17 CET 2009
Hi Mani,
Manikandan Pillai wrote:
> The cmd_misc.c was changed to fix sleep.
> nand_base.c was fixed to fix the wait.
Should this be the fix for
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-February/048107.html
?
I'm not familiar with U-Boot timer handling, so just some questions.
Maybe the U-Boot experts like to comment, too.
> Signed-off-by: Manikandan Pillai <mani.pillai at ti.com>
> ---
> common/cmd_misc.c | 1 +
> cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/interrupts.c | 13 ++++---------
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 2 ++
> include/configs/omap3_evm.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/common/cmd_misc.c b/common/cmd_misc.c
> index 024299a..e3e64c0 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_misc.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_misc.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ int do_sleep (cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *argv[])
> }
>
> delay = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 10) * CONFIG_SYS_HZ;
> + delay += get_timer(0);
As I understand above error report there is an issue with OMAP3 timer
not returning ms. Why do we have to touch cmd_misc.c for *all*
architectures then?
> while (get_timer(start) < delay) {
> if (ctrlc ()) {
> diff --git a/cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/interrupts.c b/cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/interrupts.c
> index 9e9817d..5bfe6fc 100644
> --- a/cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/interrupts.c
> +++ b/cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/interrupts.c
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ void reset_timer(void)
>
> ulong get_timer(ulong base)
> {
> - return get_timer_masked() - base;
> + return get_timer_masked();
Why don't we have to deal with base here any more?
> }
>
> void set_timer(ulong t)
> @@ -238,14 +238,9 @@ void reset_timer_masked(void)
>
> ulong get_timer_masked(void)
> {
> - ulong now = readl(&timer_base->tcrr); /* current tick value */
> -
> - if (now >= lastinc) /* normal mode (non roll) */
> - /* move stamp fordward with absoulte diff ticks */
> - timestamp += (now - lastinc);
> - else /* we have rollover of incrementer */
> - timestamp += (0xFFFFFFFF - lastinc) + now;
> - lastinc = now;
> + timestamp = readl(&timer_base->tcrr); /* current tick value */
> + /* get_timer() has to return time in milliseconds */
> + timestamp >>= 6;
Why don't we have to deal with timer overflow here any more?
As mentioned I haven't looked into the details, but why wouldn't it be
sufficient to just change first line of get_timer_masked() to
something like
ulong now = readl(&timer_base->tcrr) >> 6; /* current tick value */
to get ms?
> return timestamp;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index d33fee2..283b456 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -509,6 +509,7 @@ void nand_wait_ready(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
> u32 timeo = (CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 20) / 1000;
>
> + timeo += get_timer(0);
> reset_timer();
Same as above here and below: Why do we have to touch global code for
*all* architectures?
> /* wait until command is processed or timeout occures */
> @@ -854,6 +855,7 @@ static int nand_wait(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *this)
> else
> timeo = (CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 20) / 1000;
>
> + timeo += get_timer(0);
> if ((state == FL_ERASING) && (this->options & NAND_IS_AND))
> this->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_STATUS_MULTI, -1, -1);
> else
> diff --git a/include/configs/omap3_evm.h b/include/configs/omap3_evm.h
> index bf5614e..8d6e5fe 100644
> --- a/include/configs/omap3_evm.h
> +++ b/include/configs/omap3_evm.h
> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@
>
> #define CONFIG_SYS_TIMERBASE OMAP34XX_GPT2
> #define CONFIG_SYS_PVT V_PVT /* 2^(pvt+1) */
> -#define CONFIG_SYS_HZ ((V_SCLK) / (2 << CONFIG_SYS_PVT))
> +#define CONFIG_SYS_HZ 1000
Would be nice if you could change this for all OMAP3 boards.
Best regards
Dirk
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list