[U-Boot] [RFC] cfi_flash and complex address mapping
thomas.langer at infineon.com
thomas.langer at infineon.com
Thu Mar 26 15:39:09 CET 2009
> In message <200903261103.28452.sr at denx.de> you wrote:
> >
> > > #define FLASH_FIXUP_ADDR_8(addr) ((void*)((ulong)(addr)^2))
> > > #define FLASH_FIXUP_ADDR_16(addr) ((void*)((ulong)(addr)^2))
> ...
> > Yes, I think this could be accepted. The overall impact on
> the driver is not
> > too big. Let's see if others have some complaints about it.
> If not, I'll
> > accept you patch after you changed some minor details.
>
> I think that should be an inline function instead of a macro.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
Thanks for the comments. I will take it into account before
sending the complete patch series for the board(s).
But I have to do some more cleanups before I can do that.
I just wanted to check if this is the right way to go.
Best regards,
Thomas Langer
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list