[U-Boot] core ticks/timer code
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Tue Mar 31 10:17:06 CEST 2009
On 21:30 Fri 27 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the Blackfin core tick/timer code has been around since the start of the
> original port, but i'm not sure it's entirely correct. some common code that
> uses timers seems to be misbehaving in that the timeout is pretty much
> immediate. makes me think that we've spent time on making udelay() work, but
> then just glossed over the rest.
>
> unfortunately, there doesnt seem to be any docs on what exactly these
> functions do so it's hard for me to verify/change any of it.
>
> my understanding is that:
> - get_ticks - return some notion of "cpu ticks"
> - get_tbclk - return number of "cpu ticks" that elapse in one second
> - timer_init - setup a core timer
> - get_timer(x) - not really sure what this is supposed to represent, or how
> "x" is used
> - reset_timer - reset core timer to 0
> - CONFIG_SYS_HZ - no idea how this relates to ticks/timer in U-Boot as in the
> Linux world, this is the core timer (scheduler) frequency (how many times to
> execute per second)
I've take a look on the current timer API and I've a lot of limitation on it
as example on bitbanging we can not generate a clock over 200Khz or near
as you said the API is dark
I've in mind to partially import the clocksource linux API or create a new
U-Boot api devired from it's design
I'll propose a new design with the following Requierement
Generic delay function implementation
- ndelay()
- udelay()
- mdelay()
Generic helper
- khz2cycles()
- hz2cycles()
- cs2ns()
Timer API
- timer_init() - setup the timer
- timer_reset() - reset the timer (use in case of overflow)
- get_ticks() - return the current ticks
- get_cycles() - return the ticks frequency in ns
Best Regards,
J.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list