[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] Marvell Kirkwood family SOC support
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Sun May 3 10:32:23 CEST 2009
On 14:41 Sat 02 May , Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> Thanks Jean for your review...
>
> > > diff --git a/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/kwcore.c
> > > b/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/kwcore.c new file mode 100644 index
> > > 0000000..9eaaab6
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/cpu/arm926ejs/kirkwood/kwcore.c
> > please cpu.c
> Okay I will rename it
>
> > > */
> > > -#ifndef CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT
> > > +#if !defined (CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT) || defined
> > > +(CONFIG_ARCH_LOWLEVEL_INIT)
> > NACK
> >
> > if you skip the lowlevel init you also skip the arch lowlevel_init
> I got it already, I have encapsulated similar condition at caller function so that even though only ARCH_LOWLEVEL_INIT is define it will not skip it.
>
> >
> > if it's permannent arch init please use arch_cpu_init
> Is it really lowlevel init, needs to be called before stack/dram init, so please let it be arch_lowlevel_init.
> I am trying to keep minimal code under arch_lowlevel_init (only few assembly lines) rest I am moving to arch_cpu_init under lib_arm/board.c
the arch_cpu_init is the first init in c
and I want the current design clear
If you choice to skip the lowlevel_init you will skip all lowlevel_init
with no exception as I've in mind to regroup all start.S
Best Regards,
J.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list