[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] console/device: rework function naming

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 19:54 Sun 03 May     , Magnus Lilja wrote:
> Hi Jean-Christophe,
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vmt.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vmt.c
> > index 061da64..2b6b137 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vmt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vmt.c
> > @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ int ubi_create_volume(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_mkvol_req *req)
> >        vol->dev.class = ubi_class;
> >
> >        sprintf(&vol->dev.bus_id[0], "%s_%d", ubi->ubi_name, vol->vol_id);
> > -       err = device_register(&vol->dev);
> > +       err = console_register(&vol->dev);
> >        if (err) {
> >                ubi_err("cannot register device");
> >                goto out_gluebi;
> > @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ int ubi_add_volume(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_volume *vol)
> >        vol->dev.devt = dev;
> >        vol->dev.class = ubi_class;
> >        sprintf(&vol->dev.bus_id[0], "%s_%d", ubi->ubi_name, vol->vol_id);
> > -       err = device_register(&vol->dev);
> > +       err = console_register(&vol->dev);
> 
> Again a bit surprised to find anything about consoles in the UBI code.
> In contrast to my earlier comment, this code seems to be compiled
> (i.e. it's not within #ifdef UBI_LINUX).
> I'm guessing you did a global search/replace for
> device_register=>console_register?
yes
I've use script to generate the patch for the RFC

For ubi the device_register is replace via macro by 0

this will not been touch by the final patch

and fully check before

btw this is one of the confusing point of the current implementation

Best Regards,
J.