[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] ARM Conditionally compile board LED functions
Tom.Rix at windriver.com
Thu Nov 12 16:59:48 CET 2009
Alessandro Rubini wrote:
>> I withdraw this patch.
>> I will rethink this and come up with something better.
> I agree weak is better than ifdef. But the led situation on ARM isn't
> really pleasant when you look in lib_arm/board.c .
> When I proposed a simplification of board.c back on Jul 22 ("[RFC]
> arm/board.c: avoid ifdef using weak default functions", I noticed the
> led approach and thought it would need cleanup (for example, by moving
> out of board.c to led.c or something). However, the patch was
> rejected by JC as he has initcalls as work in progress.
> Since we still missing the initcalls (as missing JC), could that patch
> be reconsidered? I can rebase if there's any interest.
Yes I am interested.
Please rebase the RFC patch.
Here is the link to the old RFC
More information about the U-Boot