[U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

[Tom]

Dirk Behme wrote:
> Peter Tyser wrote:
>   
>> On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 19:59 +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
>>     
>>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On 09:12 Sun 06 Sep     , Dirk Behme wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> On 07:37 Sat 05 Sep     , Dirk Behme wrote:
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Dear Jean-Christophe,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please pull
>>>>>>>> The following changes since commit 3aa8b68d80dbcb6829af60485c1e388b39af793d:
>>>>>>>> Wolfgang Denk (1):
>>>>>>>>       Merge branch 'next' of ../next
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm.git master
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Albin Tonnerre (3):
>>>>>>>>     at91sam9260/afeb9260: Fix SPI initialization
>>>>>>>>     Add support for the Calao SBC35-A9G20 board
>>>>>>>>     Support for the Calao TNY-A9260/TNY-A9G20 boards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Frederik Kriewitz (1):
>>>>>>>>     Add support for the DevKit8000 board
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> I'd like to have the omap3_devkit8000.h version of that patch, instead.
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> this one is fine no need not the omap3_devkit8000 version
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Jean-Christophe: In
>>>>>
>>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-August/059087.html
>>>>>
>>>>> we agreed on omap3_devkit8000.
>>>>>           
>>>> in v4 the author prefer it devkit8000 so I respect it
>>>>         
>>> You missed v5 and v6, no?
>>>       
>> My vote is for keeping the board config file named devkit8000.h - that's
>> U-Boot's current, standard naming convention and it matches up with the
>> board name under board/.  
>>     
>
> And I vote (as agreed like mentioned above) for omap3_devkit8000.h as 
> this is the current, standard OMAP3 config file naming convention 
> which matches with all other OMAP3 configs.
>
> Best regards
>
> Dirk
>
>   
I know i may be muddying this up but..
The devkit8000 looks a lot like the beagle.
Have you already thought of just rolling devkit8000 into beagle?

My opinion on naming is to keep omap3_ prefix consistent.
People used to building with their favorite omap3_* config should continue.
For now, new omap3 boards to use the omap3_ prefix.

If we want to break the config names, we should do it after a release.
A good time for that will be when the omap4 versions come in and we
have to figure out how to put them in.

Tom

> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>