[U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Clean up whitespace in mux configs

Olof Johansson olof at lixom.net
Sun Sep 27 16:33:42 CEST 2009


On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:33:58AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:
>> Switch from space-based indentation to tab-based in mux configs, as pointed
>> out by WD at:
>
> You have only two options here: Violate space/tab rule or 80 char rule. 
> We had this discussion with Wolfgang already in the past ;)

Haha, great.

> Last time we had:
>
> ...
> [So Jan 25 2009] [18:50:28] <dirk2>	wdenk: Regarding your code comments 
> in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-January/046090.html:
> [So Jan 25 2009] [18:51:34] <dirk2>	wdenk: Regarding MUX indent:  
> normally yes, but ...
> [So Jan 25 2009] [18:51:59] <wdenk_>	...you have too long lines, then. I 
> know
> [So Jan 25 2009] [18:52:49] <dirk2>	wdenk: ... we tried several  
> formatting options, and jkridner converted one MUX file with beginning  
> TABs. The result wasn't readable better
> [So Jan 25 2009] [18:53:34] <wdenk_>	I'll not fight about this one.
> ...
>
> So last time we stayed with space instead of tab and have 80 char fine.
>
> If we want to switch now to break 80 chars (and this patch does so) but 
> have no spaces any more, I'm fine with it. Just want to give some  
> history.

Heh.

Personally I don't mind the occasional breakage of the 80 character
rule, especially for header files like these that don't affect code
flow readability.

But I don't care either way, I just reformatted it on request. If the
decision goes the other way I can repost the other patch that went on
top of this so it still applies.


-Olof


More information about the U-Boot mailing list