[U-Boot] [PATCH] relocation: Do not relocate NULL pointers.
Graeme Russ
graeme.russ at gmail.com
Mon Sep 28 01:23:36 CEST 2009
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
<joakim.tjernlund at transmode.se> wrote:
> Graeme Russ <graeme.russ at gmail.com> wrote on 27/09/2009 15:52:38:
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
>> <joakim.tjernlund at transmode.se> wrote:
>> > Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de> wrote on 23/09/2009 20:23:14:
>> >>
>> >> Dear Peter Tyser,
>> >>
>> >> In message <1253710639.3968.19.camel at ptyser-laptop> you wrote:
>> >> >
>>
>> >>
>> >> > Nice! It'd be great to have the magical 20 lines of assembly put into
>> >> > some semi-understandable c.
>> >>
>> >> :-)
>
> hmm, I don't know x86 that well, but I did look at your
> [RFC][PATCH 8/8] Final i386 Relocation
> and I don't understand it fully. To make sure, is it possible for you
> to link at address X and run from address Y directly from flash?
>
> Jocke
>
>
Ah, I know understand what you are trying to achieve - No, my code does
not allow for in-flash relocation.
My code processes the ELF relocation structures rel.got (which has pointers
into .got), got.plt (which is where the location of .got is retrieved at
run-time), rel.dyn (pointers into other sections other than .got), .dynamic
and .dynsym
I must admit, I do not know why there are so many sections which need to
be patched - I originally thought that only .got would need modifying, but
the rabbit-hole is much deeper
Regards,
G
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list