[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mpc83xx: turn on icache in core initialization to improve u-boot boot time
Kim Phillips
kim.phillips at freescale.com
Tue Apr 20 00:34:04 CEST 2010
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:19:24 -0500
Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com> wrote:
> Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:06:02 +0300
> > Michael Zaidman <michael.zaidman at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Kim Phillips
> >> <kim.phillips at freescale.com> wrote:
> >>> before, MPC8349ITX boots u-boot in 4.3sec:
> >> [snip]
> >>> after, MPC8349ITX boots u-boot in 3.0sec:
> >> Thanks for the good news! Memory POST test on my board with icach
> >> disabled was lasting for hours until I enabled icach locally before
> >> and disabled it after time consuming tests.
> >>
> >> BTW is there any reason that you enable icach in board specific rather
> >> than in common code?
> >
> > not really, was just following the existing HID0-setting paradigm -
> > I presume the paradigm came about to allow different cpu/board
> > combinations to enable/disable different HID bits. Does that not sound
> > valid to you?
>
> Shouldn't you be using icache_enable(), or at least using HID0_INIT to
> do invalidation and lock clearing?
the invalidation should occur whether or not the cache enable bit is
set in HID0_INIT, and there is no locking being done prior to this
point in the code. But I see your point; we should be using a more
formal approach. I'll see what I can do - it's just that this patch
preserved the existing code size, which could be important for e.g.,
future nand bootstrap development.
Kim
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list