[U-Boot] OMAP3 Beagle patches (was: Merge Window closed, waiting for pull request)

[Khasim Syed Mohammed]

On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 05.02.2010 16:02, Tom wrote:
>>
>> Dirk Behme wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep <s-paulraj at ti.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 20.01.2010 18:58, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Merge Window closed, waiting for pull
>>>>>>> requests
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 19.01.2010 23:30, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> as you probably have noticed, the merge window closed about 24 hours
>>>>>>>> ago. Checking my list, I still see s _long_ list of ARM related
>>>>>>>> patches that have not been processed yet. For many of them I haven't
>>>>>>>> seen any review comments, nor have architecture maintainer picked
>>>>>>>> these up and sent pull requests to Tom.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you please try and work on this now, so that we can have the
>>>>>>>> outstanding patches integrated into mainline in the next few days?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to see the Beagle rev C4 patches applied:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066629.html
>>>>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066632.html
>>>>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066634.html
>>>>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066636.html
>>>>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066638.html
>>>>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066640.html
>>>>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066642.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (The ml archive seems to have some issues with these patches. In my
>>>>>>> inbox they seem to be fine, though)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same with me but when I discussed offline with Tom, it appears as if
>>>>>
>>>>> this set never made it to his Inbox.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We need just a little more time.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the recent status of this?
>>>>
>>>> Tom had comments.
>>>
>>> Do you (or anybody else) mind to send the archive links of the
>>> comments? Just to be sure that everything will be covered and nothing
>>> is missed ;)
>>>
>>> Many thanks and best regards
>>>
>>> Dirk
>>
>> The big ones I remember are copyrights, documenting magic video
>> settings, clk tweeking needs to move to board level.
>> These weren't all of them, please see my full comments on 1/23
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
> I found some time to look at them, and I think I was able to update/fix
> patches 1-3/7. At least they are compiling fine and I think the comments are
> fixed. For reference please find them in attachment.
>
> It seems I don't have time to look at the other patches, though. So I'm not
> sure what to do with 1-3, now. Shall I send them as a seperate series 1-3/3?
> I.e. splitting the 7 patch series into smaller chunks? Or will anybody be
> able to look at the other comments asap? I'd really like to get them in
> while this merge window if possible.
>
I like the idea of submitting them as 1-3/3, I think I will get some
time this week. I will try to look at other patches, but cannot
guarantee on submission.

Regards,
Khasim