[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9 V4] add new CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY

[Daniel Gorsulowski]

Hello Tom,

Tom wrote:
> Jens Scharsig wrote:
>> * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs
>>  This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC access
>>  to c structures. If CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY is defined, the deprecated
>>  SoC is used.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig <js_at_ng at scharsoft.de>
> 
> This looks good.
> The only problem is the new at91 target otc570 is breaking.
> 
> Please take a look at errors in otc570
> 
> otc570 :
> 
> at91sam9263_devices.c: In function 'at91_serial0_hw_init':
> at91sam9263_devices.c:40: warning: implicit declaration of function 
> 'at91_set_a_periph'
> at91sam9263_devices.c: In function 'at91_spi0_hw_init':
> at91sam9263_devices.c:96: warning: implicit declaration of function 
> 'at91_set_b_periph'
> at91sam9263_devices.c:116: warning: implicit declaration of function 
> 'at91_set_pio_output'
> clock.c: In function 'at91_clock_init':
> clock.c:160: warning: implicit declaration of function 'at91_sys_read'
> clock.c:160: error: 'AT91_CKGR_MCFR' undeclared (first use in this function)
> clock.c:160: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> clock.c:160: error: for each function it appears in.)
> 
> Tom

This is caused by missing defines in include\configs\otc570.h:
#define CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY
and
#define CONFIG_AT91_GPIO	1

Should I send a patch to fix this, or should I wait for Jens patches coming
mainline?

Best regards,
Daniel Gorsulowski