[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9 V4] add new CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY

[Tom]

Daniel Gorsulowski wrote:
> Hello Tom,
> 
> Tom wrote:
>> Jens Scharsig wrote:
>>> * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs
>>>  This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC access
>>>  to c structures. If CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY is defined, the deprecated
>>>  SoC is used.
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Scharsig <js_at_ng at scharsoft.de>
>> This looks good.
>> The only problem is the new at91 target otc570 is breaking.
>>
>> Please take a look at errors in otc570
>>
>> otc570 :
>>
>> at91sam9263_devices.c: In function 'at91_serial0_hw_init':
>> at91sam9263_devices.c:40: warning: implicit declaration of function 
>> 'at91_set_a_periph'
>> at91sam9263_devices.c: In function 'at91_spi0_hw_init':
>> at91sam9263_devices.c:96: warning: implicit declaration of function 
>> 'at91_set_b_periph'
>> at91sam9263_devices.c:116: warning: implicit declaration of function 
>> 'at91_set_pio_output'
>> clock.c: In function 'at91_clock_init':
>> clock.c:160: warning: implicit declaration of function 'at91_sys_read'
>> clock.c:160: error: 'AT91_CKGR_MCFR' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> clock.c:160: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>> clock.c:160: error: for each function it appears in.)
>>
>> Tom
> 
> This is caused by missing defines in include\configs\otc570.h:
> #define CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY
> and
> #define CONFIG_AT91_GPIO	1
> 
> Should I send a patch to fix this, or should I wait for Jens patches coming
> mainline?
> 

Please send a patch.
It should be a 2-3 liner.
I will combine it with Jens' patchset and push them together.
Tom

> Best regards,
> Daniel Gorsulowski