[U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci: Driver for the davinci SPI controller

[Sudhakar Rajashekhara]

Hi Nick,

On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 15:17:51, Nick Thompson wrote:
> On 23/12/09 07:44, Sudhakar Rajashekhara wrote:
> > From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar at ti.com>
> > 
> > This adds a driver for the SPI controller found on davinci
> > based SoCs from Texas Instruments.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar at ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj at ti.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/spi/Makefile      |    1 +
> >  drivers/spi/davinci_spi.c |  205 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h |   84 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 290 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/spi/davinci_spi.c
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h
> 
> ...
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h b/drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..b3bf916
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Register definitions for the DaVinci SPI Controller
> > + */
> > +
> > +/* Register offsets */
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_GCR0	0x0000
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_GCR1	0x0004
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_INT0	0x0008
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_LVL		0x000c
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_FLG		0x0010
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_PC0		0x0014
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_PC1		0x0018
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_PC2		0x001c
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_PC3		0x0020
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_PC4		0x0024
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_PC5		0x0028
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_DAT0	0x0038
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_DAT1	0x003c
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_BUF		0x0040
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_EMU		0x0044
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_DELAY	0x0048
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_DEF		0x004c
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_FMT0	0x0050
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_FMT1	0x0054
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_FMT2	0x0058
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_FMT3	0x005c
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_INTVEC0	0x0060
> > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_INTVEC1	0x0064
> 
> I think this ought to be a C structure, rather than register offsets?
> 

I see that existing SPI drivers are not using structures for register defines.
Off-late is there a shift in u-boot in favor of structures than macros for
register definitions?

Regards,
Sudhakar