[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 11/12] SPEAr : Support added for SPEAr310 board
Tom
Tom.Rix at windriver.com
Sat Jan 16 20:20:48 CET 2010
Vipin Kumar wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Tom <Tom.Rix at windriver.com> wrote:
>> Vipin Kumar wrote:
>>> Hello Tom,
>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +#include <asm/arch/spr_defs.h>
>>>>>> +#include <asm/arch/spr_misc.h>
>>>>>> +#include <asm/arch/spr_nand.h>
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +int board_init(void)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + return spear_board_init(MACH_TYPE_SPEAR300);
>>>>>> Does this need a new mach type ?
>>>>>> I see there isn't a SPEAR310 define in mach-types.
>>>>> Actually, spear310 and spear320 are variants of a base version spear300
>>>>> This is why we are using a single mach type
>>>>>
>>>> Ok.
>>>> Then the 310 and 320 board *.c files can be combined into 300 board files
>>>> These look like they are copies of the 300 file.
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>> Please find the patchset v5 for SPEAr support on the mailing list
>>> It contains all your suggested changes
>>> Please consider it for mainline inclusion
>>>
>> I see in v5 that the 300,310,320 boards are still in separate files.
>> These all look like copies and could be combined.
>>
>> Do you expect there will be a need in the future to add unique code
>> to each of these board files?
>> If not, please look into combining them.
>>
>> I will provide feedback on the other files shortly.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>
> Although all three are based on one chip but sp300, sp310 and
> sp320 are different SoCs and support different IPs.
> Yes, board files are copies of each other as of now but may diverge in
> future
> I would rather create different mach ids rather than combining them
> into one.
Ok.
Fine to leave them as-is.
Tom
>
> Regards
> Vipin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list