[U-Boot] [PATCH 00/28] u-boot next: a generic approach for nios2 arch
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Sun Mar 21 21:28:20 CET 2010
Dear Peter,
In message <1269032821.7363.27.camel at ptyser-laptop> you wrote:
>
> I personally think that looking at a "deep threaded" patch series with
> lots of responses is much harder to grasp than the "shallow threaded".
> As a basic example:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/109790
Thanks for the link - I was not aware of this discussion.
> I would guess that the majority of other users prefer the "shallow
> threaded" style too.
I can only guess that, too. But I know my own preferences :-)
> I'm pretty sure in the --no-chain-reply-to case, git makes sure the
> email dates increment properly, and no 2 are the same. Thus any sane
> email client should order them properly when using shallow threading.
IIRC git-send-email will indeed make sure to have at least second
increments.
> I believe the default behavior of git has also been changed to
> --no-chain-reply-to for what its worth. The fact that patch order can
> be determined by both timestamp and patch title (assuming proper
> generation) seems sufficient to me to use the --no-chain-reply-to
> option.
Well, as the default behavior has been changed, it seems I'm overruled
anyway, and there is no need to take additional action.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Never worry about theory as long as the machinery does what it's
supposed to do. - R. A. Heinlein
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list