[U-Boot] [RFC] arm926ejs: fix jump to RAM nand_boot

[V, Aneesh]

Dear Wolfgang,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:wd at denx.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 6:30 PM
> To: V, Aneesh
> Cc: Reinhard Meyer; Albert ARIBAUD; u-boot at lists.denx.de; hs at denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] arm926ejs: fix jump to RAM nand_boot
> 
> Dear "V, Aneesh",
> 
> In message
> <FF55437E1F14DA4BAEB721A458B6701706FD313852 at dbde02.ent.ti.com> you
> wrote:
> >
> > Just curious. Why don't we allocate memory for such needs below
> the
> > u-boot (lower address) like we do for malloc area and stack. This
> way
> > the location where u-boot is relocated will only depend on the
> SDRAM=20
> > size and size of u-boot itself, right?
> 
> That would mean that all the memory where U-Boot was located is lost
> for use in Linux, as we reserve these areas by adjusting the "mem="
> boot argument.  Allocation of such memory blocks must start at the
> top, ang do downwards. And U-Boot lies below that, then.

Thanks. It's clear now. 

Also, I checked the time it takes to do relocation. 

On OMAP4430 with Cortex-A9 at 1GHz and LPDDR2 SDRAM at 400MHz it
took a mere 16 ms to do the relocation of u-boot image that was
about 146 KB.

I agree with you. Skipping relocation is not worth the complexity. 

Best regards,
Aneesh