[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] hwconfig: Fix dummy initialization of {board, cpu}_hwconfig
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Tue Nov 30 22:12:36 CET 2010
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:01:28 -0600
Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> diff --git a/common/hwconfig.c b/common/hwconfig.c
> index 3c9759f..da8d3ed 100644
> --- a/common/hwconfig.c
> +++ b/common/hwconfig.c
> @@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ next:
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -const char *cpu_hwconfig __attribute__((weak));
> -const char *board_hwconfig __attribute__((weak));
> +const char cpu_hwconfig[] __attribute__((weak)) = "";
> +const char board_hwconfig[] __attribute__((weak)) = "";
>
> #define HWCONFIG_PRE_RELOC_BUF_SIZE 128
>
> @@ -96,13 +96,11 @@ static const char *__hwconfig(const char *opt, size_t *arglen)
> return hwconfig_parse(env_hwconfig, strlen(env_hwconfig),
> opt, ";", ':', arglen);
>
> - if (board_hwconfig)
> - return hwconfig_parse(board_hwconfig, strlen(board_hwconfig),
> - opt, ";", ':', arglen);
> + return hwconfig_parse(board_hwconfig, strlen(board_hwconfig),
> + opt, ";", ':', arglen);
>
> - if (cpu_hwconfig)
> - return hwconfig_parse(cpu_hwconfig, strlen(cpu_hwconfig),
> - opt, ";", ':', arglen);
> + return hwconfig_parse(cpu_hwconfig, strlen(cpu_hwconfig),
> + opt, ";", ':', arglen);
>
> return NULL;
> }
Hmm. "return x; return y; return NULL;"
Was the presence of a board hwconfig really intended to override, rather
than add to, the cpu hwconfig? Should we check the return of the first
hwconfig_parse to see if it found anything?
-Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list