[U-Boot] [PATCH V3] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk

[Reinhard Meyer]

Jens Scharsig schrieb:
> Am 2010-08-31 09:36, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
>> Hi,
>>  }
>> -- 1.6.0.2 
>>
>> Applied to u-boot-atmel/next
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Reinhard
>>
> What is the reason for the new branch/Custodian Tree u-boot-atmel.
Hello,

one reason is that AVR32 and AT91 share alot in the peripheral
building blocks, so many drivers are both for AVR32 and AT91.

I will try to make sure changes to drivers in that area are
not breaking either architecture.

On that behalf I'd like a briefing why there is

at91_emac AND macb?

macb works for AVR32AP700x and (at least) for AT91SAM9260/9G20/9XE.

What is the deal with at91_emac? Is it required for some AT91's
because macb does not work there?

Does it provide better "results" than macb?

Best Regards
Reinhard