[U-Boot] [PATCH V3] AT91 Fix: return value of get_tbclk

[Jens Scharsig]

Am 2010-09-01 09:30, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> 
> at91_emac AND macb?
> 
> macb works for AVR32AP700x and (at least) for AT91SAM9260/9G20/9XE.
> 
> What is the deal with at91_emac? Is it required for some AT91's
> because macb does not work there?
> 
> Does it provide better "results" than macb?
> 
> Best Regards
> Reinhard
Hello,

I think the separation has historical reasons.
For AT91RM and AT91SAM existed separate drivers and separate arch.
I remeber in older datascheets the ethernet inteface also marked with MACB.
In my opinion, the at91_emac the latest drivers (NET_MULTI api SoC
access via c structurs).

But I dont know the exact differences are not of single use devices.
Please ask Xu, Hong

Best regards

Jens