[U-Boot] [PATCH 00/15] [REWORK AVR32/AT91] additional changes for avr32

Reinhard Meyer u-boot at emk-elektronik.de
Tue Apr 19 21:36:37 CEST 2011


Dear Andreas Bießmann,
> Am 19.04.2011 um 17:49 schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
>
>> Dear Andreas Bießmann,
>>>> Some of the patches did not apply. What did apply is now found in u-boot-atmel/next2.
>>>>
>>>> I have no idea why they do not apply, since the AVR32 part has not changed since 110202.
>>>
>>> I can check that and will rebase on u-boot-atmel/next.
>>
>> Applied to u-boot-atmel/next.
>>
>>> BTW I personally dislike your inflationary creation of new branches. The
>>> last days I could not understand why there are that much reworkXXX
>>> branches for AT91 stuff.
>>
>> Those have a date which reflect the u-boot-arm/master they were rebased onto. I rather only
>> remove them if and when all patches have been pulled into u-boot-arm (just in case).
>
> Ok, but changes to origin/master from 20101209 in rework101209 are not included in rework101217? This would not make sense to me.

I said nothing like that.

>
>>> I hope only the one with latest timestamp is
>>> worth to work with. Isn't that reworked stuff already in next branch? Or
>>> are there some tasks not yet in next branch?
>>
>> Not all is in next, all changes I did to at9sam9260/9XE/9G20-ek and out own board (TOP9000)
>> are not yet in next, I had problems rebasing them to current u-boot-arm/master and not enough
>> time yet to fix that.
>
> Ok, I've got an at91sam9260ek here and like to get it working with current mainline (plus the reworking stuff for at91 devices). Which branch should I take? Which changes are worth to look at for 2011.06 regarding sam9260 devices or is it too late for that?

Top 2 patches in rework110202 should do the trick, once they are made to apply to current next.

best regards

Reinhard


More information about the U-Boot mailing list