[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] DM9000: change some printf to use debug instead

[Detlev Zundel]

Hi Simon,

> Dear Eric Jarrige,
>
> On 08/10/2011 10:33 PM, Eric Jarrige wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Jarrige<eric.jarrige at armadeus.org>
>> Cc: Ben Warren<biggerbadderben at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/dm9000x.c |    8 ++++----
>>   1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/dm9000x.c b/drivers/net/dm9000x.c
>> index b5c5573..9cd0195 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/dm9000x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/dm9000x.c
>> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ dm9000_probe(void)
>>   	id_val |= DM9000_ior(DM9000_PIDL)<<  16;
>>   	id_val |= DM9000_ior(DM9000_PIDH)<<  24;
>>   	if (id_val == DM9000_ID) {
>> -		printf("dm9000 i/o: 0x%x, id: 0x%x \n", CONFIG_DM9000_BASE,
>> +		DM9000_DBG("dm9000 i/o: 0x%x, id: 0x%x \n", CONFIG_DM9000_BASE,
>>   		       id_val);
>>   		return 0;
>>   	} else {
>> @@ -298,19 +298,19 @@ static int dm9000_init(struct eth_device *dev, bd_t *bd)
>>
>>   	switch (io_mode) {
>>   	case 0x0:  /* 16-bit mode */
>> -		printf("DM9000: running in 16 bit mode\n");
>> +		DM9000_DBG("DM9000: running in 16 bit mode\n");
> <snip>
>
> I'am just wondering: I see that DM9000_DBG is used all over dm9000 code 
> - do you know the reason why not just use debug()?

Very likely only historical reasons as the code predates the DEBUG best
practice.  Bow that you've identified it, we should change it ;)

Cheers
  Detlev

-- 
It was actually a very beautiful thing to see a sunrise, cause' that's
such a calm time of day. It's a wonderful time of day  to get ready to
go to bed.
                                            -- Richard M. Stallman
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich,  Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: dzu at denx.de