[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] DM9000: change some printf to use debug instead

Simon Schwarz simonschwarzcor at googlemail.com
Thu Aug 11 09:26:57 CEST 2011


Dear Eric Jarrige,

On 08/10/2011 10:33 PM, Eric Jarrige wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Jarrige<eric.jarrige at armadeus.org>
> Cc: Ben Warren<biggerbadderben at gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/dm9000x.c |    8 ++++----
>   1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dm9000x.c b/drivers/net/dm9000x.c
> index b5c5573..9cd0195 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dm9000x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dm9000x.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ dm9000_probe(void)
>   	id_val |= DM9000_ior(DM9000_PIDL)<<  16;
>   	id_val |= DM9000_ior(DM9000_PIDH)<<  24;
>   	if (id_val == DM9000_ID) {
> -		printf("dm9000 i/o: 0x%x, id: 0x%x \n", CONFIG_DM9000_BASE,
> +		DM9000_DBG("dm9000 i/o: 0x%x, id: 0x%x \n", CONFIG_DM9000_BASE,
>   		       id_val);
>   		return 0;
>   	} else {
> @@ -298,19 +298,19 @@ static int dm9000_init(struct eth_device *dev, bd_t *bd)
>
>   	switch (io_mode) {
>   	case 0x0:  /* 16-bit mode */
> -		printf("DM9000: running in 16 bit mode\n");
> +		DM9000_DBG("DM9000: running in 16 bit mode\n");
<snip>

I'am just wondering: I see that DM9000_DBG is used all over dm9000 code 
- do you know the reason why not just use debug()?

Regards
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list