[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] DM9000: change some printf to use debug instead
Simon Schwarz
simonschwarzcor at googlemail.com
Thu Aug 11 09:26:57 CEST 2011
Dear Eric Jarrige,
On 08/10/2011 10:33 PM, Eric Jarrige wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Jarrige<eric.jarrige at armadeus.org>
> Cc: Ben Warren<biggerbadderben at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/dm9000x.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dm9000x.c b/drivers/net/dm9000x.c
> index b5c5573..9cd0195 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dm9000x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dm9000x.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ dm9000_probe(void)
> id_val |= DM9000_ior(DM9000_PIDL)<< 16;
> id_val |= DM9000_ior(DM9000_PIDH)<< 24;
> if (id_val == DM9000_ID) {
> - printf("dm9000 i/o: 0x%x, id: 0x%x \n", CONFIG_DM9000_BASE,
> + DM9000_DBG("dm9000 i/o: 0x%x, id: 0x%x \n", CONFIG_DM9000_BASE,
> id_val);
> return 0;
> } else {
> @@ -298,19 +298,19 @@ static int dm9000_init(struct eth_device *dev, bd_t *bd)
>
> switch (io_mode) {
> case 0x0: /* 16-bit mode */
> - printf("DM9000: running in 16 bit mode\n");
> + DM9000_DBG("DM9000: running in 16 bit mode\n");
<snip>
I'am just wondering: I see that DM9000_DBG is used all over dm9000 code
- do you know the reason why not just use debug()?
Regards
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list