[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/17] fdt: Tidy up a few fdtdec problems

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Mon Dec 5 23:53:35 CET 2011


Hi Stephen,

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com> wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 03:18 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 12/05/2011 04:11 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com> wrote:
>>>> My point is that there are probably .dts files using "ok" instead of
>>>> "okay" or the kernel wouldn't support "ok". People will probably want to
>>>> use those with U-Boot without changing anything else. So, U-Boot should
>>>> interpret the FDT in the same way as the kernel.
>>
>> The kernel has to deal with real Open Firmware systems, some of which
>> pass buggy trees.  U-Boot should not blindly imitate all of Linux's
>> workarounds.
>
> If it's certain that we'll never see anyone writing FDTs with "ok" in
> them instead of "okay" (because such FDTs were only autogenerated by
> Open Firmware), then I'm fine with the original code.
>
>>> OK, how about:
>>>              return 0 == strncmp(cell, "ok", 2);
>>>
>>> (I do feel that if you do this sort of thing you end up with people
>>> using 'ok' even in new fdts, since they look at code like this and
>>> think it is fine)
>
> That'd be buggy since it'd allow a lot more than ok/okay. A comment in
> the code would avoid the issue.

Hmm, ok I will revert to "okay" and add a comment.

Regards,
Simon

>
> --
> nvpublic


More information about the U-Boot mailing list