[U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: remove remaining NAND_MAX_CHIPS definitions

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

On 06.12.2011 19:27, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 12/06/2011 07:58 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> On 20.11.2011 16:10, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>> This change follows the change by Wolfgang Grandegger (commit
>>> 6c869637fef),
>>> which allows to remove useless NAND_MAX_CHIPS definitions in board config
>>> files.
>>>
>>> The change is based on u-boot.git/master, this branch contains 3 new
>>> boards
>>> with the defined NAND_MAX_CHIPS macro, which are not present in
>>> u-boot-nand-flash.git/master.
>>>
>>> Vladimir Zapolskiy (1):
>>>     NAND: remove NAND_MAX_CHIPS definitions
>>>
>>>    include/configs/P1_P2_RDB.h         |    3 +--
>>>    include/configs/SIMPC8313.h         |    3 +--
>>>    include/configs/VCMA9.h             |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/aria.h              |    4 ----
>>>    include/configs/bf526-ezbrd.h       |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/bf527-ad7160-eval.h |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/bf527-ezkit.h       |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/bf548-ezkit.h       |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/cm-bf527.h          |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/cpu9260.h           |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/da830evm.h          |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/da850_am18xxevm.h   |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/da850evm.h          |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/ea20.h              |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/hawkboard.h         |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/km/km_arm.h         |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/m28evk.h            |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/mecp5123.h          |    2 --
>>>    include/configs/mpc5121ads.h        |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/mv-common.h         |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/pdm360ng.h          |    2 --
>>>    include/configs/pm9261.h            |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/qi_lb60.h           |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/smdk2410.h          |    1 -
>>>    include/configs/tnetv107x_evm.h     |    1 -
>>>    25 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> is there any problem with this pending change?
>
> No, looks good.
>
Being a NAND Flash custodian, would you like to pick it up?

-- 
With best wishes,
Vladimir