[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v2] mtd/nand: workaround for Freescale FCM to support 4k pagesize Nand chip
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Mon Dec 12 21:14:17 CET 2011
On 12/12/2011 03:49 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> Freescale FCM controller has a 2K size limitation of buffer RAM. In order
> to support the Nand flash chip with pagesize larger than 2K bytes,
> we read/write 2k data repeatedly by issuing FIR_OP_RB/FIR_OP_WB and save
> them to a large buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu <Shengzhou.Liu at freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Shuo <b35362 at freescale.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c | 283 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 252 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
I've asked you several times what you're planning on doing for bad block
marker migration. I am not going to let you ignore this. NACK until
you have a migration tool, and a scheme for marking the flash as having
been migrated.
Also please mention below the --- what has changed since v1.
> @@ -393,9 +468,28 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
> page_addr, column);
>
> ctrl->column = column;
> - ctrl->oob = 0;
> + if (column >= mtd->writesize) {
> + /* OOB area */
> + column -= mtd->writesize;
> + ctrl->oob = 1;
> + } else {
> + ctrl->oob = 0;
> + }
[snip]
> @@ -432,12 +524,19 @@ static void fsl_elbc_cmdfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
> }
>
> out_be32(&lbc->fcr, fcr);
> - set_addr(mtd, column, page_addr, ctrl->oob);
> + if (column >= mtd->writesize && mtd->writesize > 2048) {
How can column >= mtd->writesize be true at this point? You've already
subtracted it out.
> if (ctrl->oob || ctrl->column != 0 ||
> - ctrl->index != mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize)
> - out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, ctrl->index);
> - else
> + ctrl->index != mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize) {
> + if (ctrl->oob && mtd->writesize > 2048) {
> + out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 64);
> + } else {
> + out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, ctrl->index -
> + ctrl->column);
> + }
> + } else {
> out_be32(&lbc->fbcr, 0);
> + }
Again, if we're going to make an API assumption that we get either a
full page access or a full OOB access, then make the assumption fully.
Don't half-implement partial accessses.
> +int board_nand_init_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +{
> + struct nand_chip *nand = mtd->priv;
> + struct fsl_elbc_mtd *priv = nand->priv;
> + struct fsl_elbc_ctrl *ctrl = priv->ctrl;
> +
> + /* adjust Option Register and ECC to match Flash page size */
> + if (mtd->writesize == 512) {
> + clrbits_be32(&ctrl->regs->bank[priv->bank].or, OR_FCM_PGS);
> + } else if (mtd->writesize >= 2048 && mtd->writesize <= 8192) {
> + setbits_be32(&ctrl->regs->bank[priv->bank].or, OR_FCM_PGS);
> + /* adjust ecc setup if needed */
> + if ((in_be32(&ctrl->regs->bank[priv->bank].br) & BR_DECC) ==
> + BR_DECC_CHK_GEN) {
> + nand->ecc.size = 512;
Please find some way to indent the continuation line so it doesn't line
up with the if-body.
> + nand->ecc.layout = (priv->fmr & FMR_ECCM) ?
> + &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm1 : &fsl_elbc_oob_lp_eccm0;
> + nand->badblock_pattern = &largepage_memorybased;
Those oob layouts won't be quite right for larger page sizes.
-Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list