[U-Boot] ARM: Incorrect ROM protection range?

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Albert ARIBAUD,

In message <4D66A7CD.9020309 at free.fr> you wrote:
>
> > As far as I can tell, arch/powerpc/lib/board.c ,
> > arch/avr32/lib/board.c and examples/standalone/stubs.c actually all
> > mean __bss_end, as well as all the start.S files, so this seems to be
> > consistently used at least.
> 
> I'd come to the same conclusion on my side. However you don't say how 
> you would like the change to be done. Would a single commit for renaming 
> _end into _bss_end and then creating _end after .dynsym be ok for you?

Ah, sorry.

Well, these are two logically separate things: the first is just a
renamer that should basicly result in the very same images built on
all systems (which can easily be verified semi-automatically).  The
second step would be adding _end at the end of the used data area (end
of .dynsym) on ARM only.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
G's Third Law:             In spite of all evidence  to  the  contra-
ry,  the  entire  universe  is composed of only two basic substances:
magic and bullshit.
H's Dictum:                There is no magic ...