[U-Boot] ARM: Incorrect ROM protection range?

[Po-Yu Chuang]

Dear Wolfgang and Albert,

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de> wrote:
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
> In message <4D66A7CD.9020309 at free.fr> you wrote:
>>
>> > As far as I can tell, arch/powerpc/lib/board.c ,
>> > arch/avr32/lib/board.c and examples/standalone/stubs.c actually all
>> > mean __bss_end, as well as all the start.S files, so this seems to be
>> > consistently used at least.
>>
>> I'd come to the same conclusion on my side. However you don't say how
>> you would like the change to be done. Would a single commit for renaming
>> _end into _bss_end and then creating _end after .dynsym be ok for you?
>
> Ah, sorry.
>
> Well, these are two logically separate things: the first is just a
> renamer that should basicly result in the very same images built on
> all systems (which can easily be verified semi-automatically).  The
> second step would be adding _end at the end of the used data area (end
> of .dynsym) on ARM only.

I don't have the environment to build other platforms, so... does any
of you please
to provide such patches?

regards,
Po-Yu Chuang