[U-Boot] NAND Bad Blocks and OOB
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Fri Mar 18 20:25:41 CET 2011
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:43:06 +0100
<VirtualFight at web.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I have some questions about the bad block management in the NAND-driver, I hope this is the right place to ask this:
>
> The things I believe to know, please correct me, if its wrong:
> If
> I have a new NAND-Flash, the manufacturer marked the bad block in the
> spare area/OOB (normaly good blocks are marked as 0xFF in the first 2
> bytes?).
> The u-boot scans for these bad blocks and saves the information in the bbt.
>
> What
> happens, if a block gets worn out? Would this block only be markes as
> bad in the bbt, or would this information would be also stored in the
> spare area (the driver write another value, not 0xFF in the firts 2
> bytes?).
As long as you have an in-flash bbt, it only gets marked in the bbt. If you
don't have an in-flash bbt, an OOB bad block marker is written.
> Is it possible to restore the bad block informations, if the
> whole nand-flash would be erased (for example by writing 0 in all block
> and after this by erasing the blocks and check the error status bit of
> the NAND-flash device)?
It's possible to do your own testing and mark blocks bad as a result, but
you're not really restoring the original information. The manufacturer may
have used a more rigorous test.
> If yes, is such a function implemented in u-boot?
No. You should avoid clearing manufacturer-set bad block markers.
-Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list