[U-Boot] P2020 L2 cache as SRAM
Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
B10812 at freescale.com
Wed Oct 19 14:12:14 CEST 2011
Hello
The NAND boot on P2020RDB does not use L2 , instead it uses DDR.
These changes are upstream.
Regards
Poonam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de]
> On Behalf Of DarkKhan
> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 5:23 PM
> To: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] P2020 L2 cache as SRAM
>
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> I need your help with an issue ,i think, related to this topic.
>
> I have P2020RDB development kit and try to boot it from nand flash using
> u-boot codes.
>
> But unfortunately, nand boot process is trapped. Once i have changed the
> value of the CONFIG_SYS_INIT_L2_ADDR definition from F8F80000 to the
> F7F80000, than that problem has been disappeared. Why ?! Any idea ?
>
> Also i wonder, why this CONFIG_SYS_INIT_L2_ADDR is chosen as F8F80000
> for the L2 SRAM base adress through the u-boot codes.
>
> Those codes can be found form those links below:
>
> http://gitorious.org/beagleboard-validation/u-
> boot/blobs/f51cdaf19141151ce2b40d562a468605340f2315/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8
> 5xx/cpu_init_nand.c
> (=> Line number 48)
>
> http://gitorious.org/beagleboard-validation/u-
> boot/blobs/525f6c3add71c0fba0911d770bba5e9282be0cf2/include/configs/P1_P2
> _RDB.h
> (=> Line number 106)
>
> I couldn't undertand why f8f80000 address is chosen for L2 SRAM base
> adress in the the u-boot P1_P2_RDB.h header file?
>
>
> thnx for
> your
> attention.
>
> -murat
>
>
> Scott Wood-2 wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:50:52 +0100
> > Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese at indel.ch> wrote:
> >
> >> At 09:07 17.01.2011 +0100, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
> >> >Hi
> >> >
> >> >We're trying to configure the PPC P2020 cpu to use the L2 cache as
> >> >SRAM so we can load the U-Boot code in there. However we stumble
> >> >into problems. Sometimes the cpu goes on trap when trying to access
> >> >this area. Sometimes there's no trap but we seem to access a
> >> >different area. That's probably a problem with setting up a TLB/LAW.
> >> >
> >> >Has anybody already done this and could share some code with us?
> >> >
> >> >I've seen that there's a mpc85xx branch with quite some work going
> >> >on. Where should we base our work on? Should we use the master or is
> >> >it better to use this branch? I'm used to svn, not git, so there may
> >> >be other options I don't know about yet.
> >>
> >> I know you're busy with patches and releasing, I just wanted to ask
> >> again if anybody has already done this.
> >
> > Yes, it's been done. P1_P2_RDB does this when configured for NAND
> boot.
> >
> > Look for CONFIG_SYS_INIT_L2_ADDR.
> >
> > -Scott
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > U-Boot mailing list
> > U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-U-Boot--P2020-L2-
> cache-as-SRAM-tp30688713p32681721.html
> Sent from the Uboot - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list