[U-Boot] [PATCH v7] dreamplug: initial board support.

Prafulla Wadaskar prafulla at marvell.com
Wed Sep 14 08:39:11 CEST 2011



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason [mailto:u-boot at lakedaemon.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 7:47 PM
> To: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Albert Aribaud; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7] dreamplug: initial board support.
> 
> Albert,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:00:59PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Prafulla,
> >
> > In message <F766E4F80769BD478052FB6533FA745D1A114670B3 at SC-
> VEXCH4.marvell.com> you wrote:
> > >
> > > Let's have Wolfgang's opinion on this, since this not aligned with
> current
> > > u-boot development strategy.
> > >
> > > May be we can create a separate header file for tracking
> (unsupported/tobe
> > > supported) arm machine-types.
> >
> > Actually this is for Albert to comment.  He is the ARM custodian and
> > has to live with the results.
> 
> Wolfgang, Marek Vasut, and I discussed this here [1].  To summarize, by
> declaring non-mainlined mach_types in the respective board config, an
> error will be thrown at compile time after mach-types.h is updated to
> include the mach_type.
> 
> The other idea is to have a separate file, say mach-types-local.h where
> all non-mainlined mach-types would be defined.

I will vote for this second approach so that it becomes independent change and anyone can update it in future.

Let's get Albert's opinion on this.

Regards..
Prafulla . .

> 
> Thoughts?  I can do whichever.
> 
> thx,
> 
> Jason.
> 
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg60921.html


More information about the U-Boot mailing list