[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] image: add support for Android's boot image format

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 09/16/2011 11:35 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2011 17:28:08 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> On 09/16/2011 11:03 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Sebastian Andrzej Siewior,
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2008 The Android Open Source Project
>>>> + * All rights reserved.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>>>> + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
>>>> + * are met:
>>>> + *  * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
>>>> + *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>>>> + *  * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>>>> + *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
>>>> + *    the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
>>>> + *    distribution.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
>>>> + * "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
>>>> + * LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS
>>>> + * FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
>>>> + * COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT,
>>>> + * INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING,
>>>> + * BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES;
>>>> LOSS + * OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER
>>>> CAUSED + * AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
>>>> LIABILITY, + * OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN
>>>> ANY WAY OUT + * OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
>>>> POSSIBILITY OF + * SUCH DAMAGE.
>>>> + */
>>>
>>> Are you 100% sure this is a GPLv2+ compatible license??? I don't think
>>> so...
>>
>> How so? This is a 3-clause BSD license. According to [0] it is
>> compatible. Is there anything I missed here?
>
> i think you mean 2-clause
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_License#2-
> clause_license_.28.22Simplified_BSD_License.22_or_.22FreeBSD_License.22.29

Ups, sorry, Yes, I do.

> -mike

Sebastian