[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] NAND: Make page, erase, oob size available via cmd_nand

[Scott Wood]

On 09/11/2011 11:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The "nand info" and "nand device" now set shell/environment variables:
> 	nand_writesize ... nand page size
> 	nand_oobsize ..... nand oob area size
> 	nand_erasesize ... nand erase block size
> 
> The shell variables are only set if HUSH is enabled.
> 
> Also, the "nand info" command now displays this info.

"writesize" is what the internals use for this, but nand_pagesize would
be more obvious.

> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com>
> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de>
> Cc: Detlev Zundel <dzu at denx.de>
> ---
>  common/cmd_nand.c |   42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
> index a1c8dfd..5b7e83d 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_nand.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_nand.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
>  #include <asm/byteorder.h>
>  #include <jffs2/jffs2.h>
>  #include <nand.h>
> +#ifdef	CONFIG_SYS_HUSH_PARSER
> +#include <hush.h>
> +#endif

I don't think you need this ifdef.

> +	/* Set geometry info */
> +#ifdef	CONFIG_SYS_HUSH_PARSER
> +	memset(buf, 0, bufsz);
> +	sprintf(buf, "nand_writesize=%x", nand->writesize);
> +	set_local_var(buf, 0);
> +
> +	memset(buf, 0, bufsz);
> +	sprintf(buf, "nand_oobsize=%x", nand->oobsize);
> +	set_local_var(buf, 0);
> +
> +	memset(buf, 0, bufsz);
> +	sprintf(buf, "nand_erasesize=%x", nand->erasesize);
> +	set_local_var(buf, 0);
> +#else
> +	memset(buf, 0, bufsz);
> +	sprintf(buf, "%x", nand->writesize);
> +	setenv("nand_writesize", buf);
> +
> +	memset(buf, 0, bufsz);
> +	sprintf(buf, "%x", nand->oobsize);
> +	setenv("nand_oobsize", buf);
> +
> +	memset(buf, 0, bufsz);
> +	sprintf(buf, "%x", nand->erasesize);
> +	setenv("nand_erasesize", buf);
> +#endif

Is there no existing abstraction to add a variable to both the shell (if
present) and the environment, without needing such an ifdef in the
caller?  If not, should one be added?

-Scott