[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Convert {in, out}s[bwl] to inline functions
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Wed Sep 28 00:40:01 CEST 2011
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 01:57:52 PM Nick Thompson wrote:
>> On 27/09/11 11:21, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:31:15 AM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> >> Dear Marek Vasut,
>> >>
>> >> In message <1317062895-3847-1-git-send-email-marek.vasut at gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>> >>> The size of uboot binary grows by a few bytes, but the gain (better
>> >>> type checking) is worth it.
>> >>
>> >> And what _exactly_ are "a few bytes" ?
>> >
>> > Nevermind, it must have been some kind of a fluctuation yesterday. Right
>> > now, I made a new measurement and the size didn't change with/without
>> > the patch (this is more what I'd expect to happen).
>> >
>> > Cheers
>>
>> Pure speculation on my part, but /could/ this be because ARM drivers don't
>> tend to use these macros/functions. write[bwl] and the like are much more
>> common. I don't know this to be a fact though.
>
> No, I'm dead sure I use this macro in the test.
>
>>
>> Nick.
>
Hi,
Can't comment on the patch format, etc.
I tested this on my Seaboard, with no code size increase, and all
worked as expected. I can't see why it would increase code size
either.
But I have a few questions: what devices actually uses this macro?
Otherwise I'm not sure if I am testing anything. Also, why not convert
all the macros in this file? Seems like a good idea to me. Or is this
patch just to test the waters? :-)
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list