[U-Boot] [PATCH 08/08] include/configs: Better utilize CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH

Tom Rini trini at ti.com
Tue Apr 17 01:52:13 CEST 2012


On 04/16/2012 01:56 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
>
> In message<4F8C3615.9040401 at ti.com>  you wrote:
>>
>>> I actually tend to believe it is a bad idea to have the #ifdef for
>>> CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH in<config_cmd_default.h>
>>
>> And perhaps we should drop IMLS/FLASH from config_cmd_default these days?
>
> No.  Rather I'd like to see "imls" extended to support NAND as well
> :-)

To be a little serious, with NAND shouldn't one be using ubifs/ubiload?

-- 
Tom


More information about the U-Boot mailing list