[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: fix bootm with device tree

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:29:15PM -0700, Tom Warren wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Rini [mailto:tom.rini at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tom Rini
> > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 1:53 PM
> > To: Stephen Warren; Wolfgang Denk
> > Cc: Simon Schwarz; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Tom Warren
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: fix bootm with device tree
> > 
> > * PGP Signed by an unknown key
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:42:26PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > On 04/19/2012 03:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On 04/19/2012 02:09 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > >> From: Stephen Warren<swarren at nvidia.com>
> > > >>
> > > >> Commit 0a672d4 "arm: Add Prep subcommand support to bootm"
> > > >> re-organized
> > > >> do_bootm_linux() for ARM. During the re-organization, the code to
> > > >> pass the device tree to the kernel was removed. Add it back. This
> > > >> restores the ability to boot a kernel using device tree.
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren<swarren at nvidia.com>
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Tom Rini <trini at ti.com>
> > >
> > > Who's going to take this patch through their tree? Is it Albert or
> > > Wolfgang directly, or should I ask Tom Warren to do it through the
> > > Tegra tree?
> > 
> > I would suggest Wolfgang directly.
> 
> I have it in my u-boot-tegra/next branch on denx right now, just so I can test kernel boot.
> It's arch/arm/lib/bootm.c, though, so shouldn't it go thru Albert's tree?

It's a relatively obvious fix (since it restores code that was removed
by accident).  And since Wolfgang wants to release tomorrow, I think
it's reasonable to just have this go in, unless Albert snags this and
sends off a PR right away. :)

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20120420/12dffee0/attachment.pgp>