[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/7] dfu: MMC specific routines for DFU operation
Lukasz Majewski
l.majewski at samsung.com
Thu Aug 2 16:47:02 CEST 2012
Dear Mike Frysinger,
> On Tuesday 31 July 2012 02:37:00 Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/dfu/dfu_mmc.c
> >
> > +static int mmc_block_op(enum dfu_mmc_op op, struct dfu_entity *dfu,
> > + void *buf, long *len)
> > +{
> > + ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER(char, cmd_buf, DFU_CMD_BUF_SIZE);
>
> ugh, what ? you're passing this string to run_command so there is no
> point in aligning it
Ok, I will change this.
> (not to mention the topic of u-boot code
> internally calling run_command() is seriously wrong.
We are all aware that this approach is a compromise. And this code
will be rewritten when new DM appears.
>
> > + memset(cmd_buf, '\0', sizeof(cmd_buf));
> > +
> > + sprintf(cmd_buf, "mmc %s 0x%x %x %x",
>
> that memset is pointless. delete it.
Done.
>
> > +static int mmc_file_op(enum dfu_mmc_op op, struct dfu_entity *dfu,
> > + void *buf, long *len)
> > +{
>
> came comments for this func as above
>
> > +int dfu_fill_entity_mmc(struct dfu_entity *dfu, char* s)
>
> "char *s", not "char* s". please search all your patches for this
> mistake as it seems to have come up a lot.
Hmm, ./tools/checkpatch wasn't complaining about this...
> -mike
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung Poland R&D Center | Linux Platform Group
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list