[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/fsl-corenet: remove dead variant symbols

Scott Wood scottwood at freescale.com
Wed Aug 15 19:19:59 CEST 2012


On 08/15/2012 09:21 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Aug 14, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> 
>> On 08/14/2012 04:31 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 14, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>>
>>>> These are not supported as individual build targets, but instead
>>>> are supported by another target.
>>>>
>>>> The dead p4040 defines in particular had bitrotted significantly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/Makefile         |    3 --
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h |   68 ++---------------------------
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/immap_85xx.h     |    2 +-
>>>> drivers/net/fm/Makefile                   |    1 -
>>>> include/configs/P2041RDB.h                |    2 +-
>>>> include/configs/P4080DS.h                 |    1 +
>>>> include/configs/P5020DS.h                 |    2 +-
>>>> 7 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> I had put these in for customer specific boards... 
>>
>> Why wouldn't they use the p2041/p4080/p5020 symbol?  The point is we
>> support both at runtime.
>>
>>> I understand we might have bit rot, but I guess I'd rather we added:
>>>
>>> P2040RDB, P4040DS, and P5010DS to boards.cfg to test these SoC builds than remove the code.
>>
>> I disagree.  That adds extra builds to test and maintain for no real gain.
> 
> It was an attempt to try and reduce some confusion for customers if they happen to utilize a P4040/P2040/P5010.

Well, I did add comments saying "this also supports <foo>".  I think
documentation is the way to deal with this, or maybe a target name alias
mechanism if we're really having problems with customers unable to
figure this out.

If we do add separate builds I predict they will receive approximately
zero test coverage beyond the occasional (now slightly slower) MAKEALL.

> We have the same issue with P1/P2 SoCs and single core vs dual core devices.

I'd be happy to see those extra builds go away too.

-Scott




More information about the U-Boot mailing list