[U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] nand_spl: change out_be32 to raw_writel and depend on subsequent sync

[Andy Fleming]

I'm ok if you take them. I should be doing a push today, so either way works for me.

On Aug 18, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Scott Wood wrote:

> On 08/13/2012 06:23 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote:
>>> This change reduces the SPL size by removing the redundant syncs produced
>>> by out_be32 and just replies on one final sync
>>> 
>>> Done with:
>>> 
>>> sed -r '/in_be32/b; s/(out_be32)\(([^,]*),\s+(.*)\)/__raw_writel(\3, \2)/g' -i `git grep --name-only sdram_init nand_spl/`
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <msm at freescale.com>
>>> ---
>>> nand_spl/board/freescale/p1010rdb/nand_boot.c     |   54 ++++++++++-----------
>>> nand_spl/board/freescale/p1023rds/nand_boot.c     |   42 ++++++++--------
>>> nand_spl/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/nand_boot.c |   48 +++++++++---------
>>> 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>> 
>> This should come first if the other patches break without it, to
>> preserve bisectability.
>> 
>> Note that I'm going to try to convert this stuff (at least one board as
>> an example, but hopefully it should be easy enough to do additional
>> boards once the first is done) to the new spl Really Soon Now(tm), so it
>> doesn't make much sense to fiddle around with the old stuff right now
>> unless I miss the merge window.  I'll incorporate these changes into the
>> new-spl version.  I may do that by applying these patches first, but I'd
>> rather they not go via the mpc85xx tree (and please CC me on NAND patches).
> 
> I'm not going to have this working by the end of the merge window, so
> these patches can go in as is.  Andy, do you want to take them or should I?
> 
> -Scott
>