[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] usbh/ehci: Increase timeout for enumeration
Vipin Kumar
vipin.kumar at st.com
Wed Dec 12 13:00:15 CET 2012
On 12/12/2012 5:10 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote:
> On 12/12/12 11:54, Vipin Kumar wrote:
>>
>>>> + ulong start = get_timer(0);
>>>> +
>>>> + do {
>>>> + ret = usb_get_port_status(dev, i + 1, portsts);
>>>> + if (ret< 0) {
>>>> + USB_HUB_PRINTF("get_port_status failed\n");
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + portstatus = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortStatus);
>>>> + portchange = le16_to_cpu(portsts->wPortChange);
>>>> +
>>>> + if ((portchange& USB_PORT_STAT_C_CONNECTION) ==
>>>> + (portstatus& USB_PORT_STAT_CONNECTION))
>>>
>>> I don't know if there is any corner case when the above check
>>> will always fail and so it will always wait a maximal delay time.
>>> Are those registers that identical, or can there be differences?
>>>
>>>> + break;
>>>> +
>>>> + mdelay(100);
>>>> + } while (get_timer(start)< CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 10);
>>>
>>> Is there any justification for the CONFIG_SYS_HZ * 10?
>>> I would be much more fine with this patch if there were any
>>> (even just test based * 2) reason for that number.
>>>
>>
>> Not really. Just a practical test.
>
> Ok. good. can we please have a comment saying that this value
> is based on observations? Thanks!
> You can add my ack along with the comment in v3.
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
Thanks Igor
Marek, I am waiting for your comments now, if any
-Vipin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list