[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] sf: Enable prints on erase and write functions

Jagan Teki jagannadh.teki at gmail.com
Wed Dec 12 15:43:46 CET 2012


Hi Simon,

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.teki at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> I understand your concern.
>>
>> But currently there is no prints a/f reading/writing/erasing the SPI flash.
>> User's are unable to confirm whether that particular sf commands are
>> properly done/not.
>
> Well if there is no error, then I suppose it worked ok. We should
> definitely print errors, and progress information can sometimes be
> useful for very long operations. But serial and LCD output is slow, so
> it can affect run time, quite apart from the verbosity, so IMO the
> less the better.
>
> Would it not be possible to put this message into cmd_sf.c?

Yes it will possible to do this on cmd_sf.
But I am not understanding what is the side effect, if we put in this area..
will you please elaborate.

Thanks,
Jagan.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jagan.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
>>> <jagannadh.teki at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > This patch provides to enabled the prints on erase and write
>>> > functions to make sure that how many bytes erase/write into flash
>>> > device.
>>> >
>>> > Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <jagannadh.teki at gmail.com>
>>> > ---
>>> >  drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c |    4 ++--
>>> >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> >
>>> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c
>>> > index 00aece9..464c2ab 100644
>>> > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c
>>> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c
>>> > @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ int spi_flash_cmd_write_multi(struct spi_flash
>>> > *flash, u32 offset,
>>> >                 byte_addr = 0;
>>> >         }
>>> >
>>> > -       debug("SF: program %s %zu bytes @ %#x\n",
>>> > +       printf("SF: program %s %zu bytes @ %#x\n",
>>> >               ret ? "failure" : "success", len, offset);
>>>
>>> I don't think we want this - it will make programming very slow and
>>> verbose.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >         spi_release_bus(flash->spi);
>>> > @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ int spi_flash_cmd_erase(struct spi_flash *flash, u32
>>> > offset, size_t len)
>>> >                         goto out;
>>> >         }
>>> >
>>> > -       debug("SF: Successfully erased %zu bytes @ %#x\n", len, start);
>>> > +       printf("SF: Successfully erased %zu bytes @ %#x\n", len, start);
>>>
>>> You may want to put this code into cmd_sf instead, where it is
>>> reasonable to add messages. You are changing core spi code which might
>>> be used from many places.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >   out:
>>> >         spi_release_bus(flash->spi);
>>> > --
>>> > 1.7.0.4
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > U-Boot mailing list
>>> > U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>>> > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Simon
>>
>>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list