[U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_nand: add biterror insertion command for NAND Flash
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Thu Jan 5 20:11:47 CET 2012
On 01/05/2012 02:59 AM, Holger Brunck wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On 01/04/2012 06:44 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>> On 01/04/2012 09:32 AM, Holger Brunck wrote:
>>>
>>> Initial implementation for unsafe feature for biterror insertion on
>>> NAND-Flash devices. The code flips single bits in the data block of the
>>> flash to simulate single bit-errors.
>>> Tested with Samsung K9F1G08U0D and Micron MT29F1G08ABADAWP on
>>> km_kirkwood boards.
>>
>> Do we still need dedicated code for this now that we have the ability to
>> do raw writes?
>>
>
> to be able to do raw writes was very usefull for me to reproduce a bug in the
> UBI layer in the past. Bitflips happen very rarely but they happen, and with
> this code you are able to force this and see how other SW layer handle this. Due
> to the fact there was an empty implementation in the u-boot code for this I
> thought it might be usefull for others too.
The biterr stub has been around since before we had raw writes. If we
decide we don't need a separate biterr command, we should remove the stub.
Anything the biterr command does should be possible with raw writes, so
while having a dedicated command might be slightly more convenient, I
don't think it's worth the extra code size, review/fix iterations, and
maintenance.
Does anyone else have a strong opinion on the matter?
-Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list