[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] nand/fsl_elbc: Convert to self-init

[Mike Frysinger]

On Monday 16 January 2012 15:03:37 Scott Wood wrote:
> On 01/16/2012 01:58 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 16 January 2012 11:51:14 Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 01/15/2012 01:29 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 12 January 2012 20:59:41 Scott Wood wrote:
> >>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c
> >>>> 
> >>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_LIST
> >>>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_LIST { CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE }
> >>>> +#endif
> >>> 
> >>> would this be better off in nand.h ?
> >> 
> >> I'm trying to get away from the model where the NAND subsystem pretends
> >> to know anything about how a driver talks to its hardware (except when
> >> the driver chooses to use a common NAND function that uses things like
> >> IO_ADDR_R/W).  For eLBC it probably makes more sense to specify the
> >> chipselect rather than the address (we have to search for the former
> >> based on the latter), though that's a separate change that can happen on
> >> its own now that the connection to subsystem code has been severed.
> > 
> > so the idea would be to let CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_LIST and
> > CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE die for devices that could care less ?
> 
> Yes.

ok ... no complaints from me then ;)

> > and eventually obsolete CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE ?
> 
> This is harder, as we still have a notion of an array of enumerated NAND
> devices in the command line code.

sure, it'll require some more plumbing to make happen
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20120116/707193e5/attachment.pgp>