[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/20] tegra: Add EMC support for optimal memory timings
Stephen Warren
swarren at nvidia.com
Fri Jan 20 01:10:16 CET 2012
On 01/19/2012 04:59 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com> wrote:
>> On 01/13/2012 02:35 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> From: Jimmy Zhang <jimmzhang at nvidia.com>
>>>
>>> Add support for setting up the memory controller parameters. Boards
>>> can set up an appropriate table in the device tree.
...
>> emc {
>> ...
>> nvidia,use-ram-code;
>> emc-tables {
>> nvidia,ram-code = <0>;
>> emc-table at 190000 {
>> compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-emc-table";
>> ...
>> };
>> emc-table at 380000 {
>> compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-emc-table";
>> ...
>> };
>> };
>> emc-tables {
>> nvidia,ram-code = <1>;
>> emc-table at 190000 {
>> compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-emc-table";
>> ...
>> };
>> emc-table at 380000 {
>> compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-emc-table";
>> ...
>> };
>> };
>> };
...
>> BTW, does:
>>
>> + node = fdtdec_next_compatible(blob, node,
>> + COMPAT_NVIDIA_TEGRA20_EMC_TABLE);
>>
>> limit itself to searching child nodes?
>
> No; I will add that to the docs.
OK, in that case, you'll probably want to augment the EMC DT parsing
code to validate that the node returned by fdtdec_next_compatible is
underneath the same parent node (or perhaps add a new utility function
to do this). Otherwise, if you search RAM code 0's node and there's no
match, you could end up using a table from under RAM code 1's node.
--
nvpublic
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list