[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to km_kirkwood

[Prafulla Wadaskar]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.brunck at keymile.com]
> Sent: 03 July 2012 18:02
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Valentin Longchamp;
> albert.u.boot at aribaud.net
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to
> km_kirkwood
> 
> On 07/03/2012 01:19 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.brunck at keymile.com]
> >> Sent: 03 July 2012 16:08
> >> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> >> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Valentin Longchamp
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to
> >> km_kirkwood
> >>
> >> Hi Prafulla,
> >>
> >> On 07/03/2012 10:05 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.brunck at keymile.com]
> >>>> Sent: 13 June 2012 19:03
> >>>> To: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> >>>> Cc: Holger Brunck; Valentin Longchamp; Prafulla Wadaskar
> >>>> Subject: [PATCH v2 03/14] arm/km: convert mgcoge3un target to
> >>>> km_kirkwood
> >>>>
> >>>> Use the generic header km_kirkwood.h and get rid of the
> >>>> board specific header.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck at keymile.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp
> <valentin.longchamp at keymile.com>
> >>>> cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafulla at marvell.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> changes for v2:
> >>>>    - rebased because of changes in other patches
> >>>>
> >>>>  board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c |    9 ++--
> >>>>  boards.cfg                    |    2 +-
> >>>>  include/configs/km_kirkwood.h |   46 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>  include/configs/mgcoge3un.h   |   87 ---------------------------
> --
> >> ---
> >>>> ---------
> >>>>  4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> >>>>  delete mode 100644 include/configs/mgcoge3un.h
> >>>
> >>> This patch makes sense to me since it since it shrinks overall
> code.
> >>> Doe not have dependency in patch series, can be accepted if
> outside
> >> the series.
> >>>
> >>
> >> again, but there are a lot of dependencies between 01-02 and 03-04
> >> because all
> >> doing a lot in km_kirkwood.h.  So do you have any particular
> >> objections against
> >> the first two patches, beside your input for the kwbimage.cfg which
> I
> >> answered
> >> in a different mail?
> >
> > As I suggested earlier
> >
> > You may have patch series for the bugfixes/improvements to the
> currently supported code.
> >
> > You may have new board support as separate patch, if those have
> dependency, get it addressed first.
> >
> > As such I do not have any objection about longer patch series but
> > Generally having a long patch series requires longer time to be get
> pulled in.
> >
> 
> so and when do you think to pull this in? AFAIK we are shortly before
> rc1. And I
> would like to  see this in, everything was published before the merge
> window was
> closed and we have reacted on every input you gave. But we can't react
> on inputs
> which are not clearly stated.
> 
> So how do we proceed here to get this in for v2012.07? If I summarize
> the
> situation you don't have any particular objections against 01-08 of
> this series.
> So should I resend these eight patches as a standalone serie to get at
> least
> these patches in?

Yes, Please send the patch series for bug fix and improvements ONLY, I will pull them ASAP.

The others we can converge soon.

Regards...
Prafulla . . .